Half Union Coin: The Forgotten 50 Dollar U.S. Gold Coin
The gold Half Union pattern is officially known as J-1548 in reference books. Image: Smithsonian Institution
Summary: Due to the widespread use of gold for commerce in America's western territories during the middle of the 19th century, a larger size of gold coin was considered.
The California Gold Rush of 1849 profoundly transformed the United States. It greatly increased the amount of gold in the country. Under the gold standard, this meant that the amount of money and wealth in the U.S. also grew. Moreover, the Gold Rush accelerated the pace of settlement and development in the American West. Very little infrastructure existed in the region in the mid-19th century nonetheless. It was truly still frontier country at the time. The West was also chronically short of gold coinage. This was exacerbated by the pervasive lack of trust in paper money. At the time, unregulated "wildcat banks" were springing up across the country. Paper notes from these banks would only be accepted at a steep discount to their face value, if they were accepted as payment at all. Since only gold was trusted for commerce, a larger denomination gold coin would allow merchants and banks to transfer large sums of money more efficiently. Even the establishment of a new U.S. Mint branch in San Francisco in 1854 didn't alleviate the problem. In response many privately-issued gold tokens were distributed throughout the 1850s. Between the unreliability of wildcat banks and the use of privately-minted gold, you can get a glimpse of how different the economic landscape was back then. We must also consider the cost and logistics of shipping gold back and forth between commercial centers on the east coast and the western states and territories. One obvious solution would be a larger legal tender gold coin. In a bill introduced by California Senator William Gwin in 1854, each Half Union coin theoretically would have contained nearly 2.5 troy ounces of pure gold content. This would allow the new denomination to remain proportional in metal value to existing U.S. coinage. It was to measure nearly 51 mm in diameter. The larger coin would provide a trusted way to facilitate smoother trade and transactions.Liberty head design on the obverse of the 1877 Half Union coin. Image: Heritage Auctions
Summary: Profit-driven employees at the United States Mint revived the idea of a $50 gold coin in the late 19th century.
20 years after its initial proposal, the idea of the Half Union was revived by Robert Linderman, the Director of the U.S. Mint. By then, federally-issued paper money (known as "greenbacks") were widely available. The need for larger gold coinage had mostly abated, making the $50 Half Union moot. Many called it [Linderman's "pet project."](https://coins.ha.com/itm/patterns/1877-50-fifty-dollar-judd-1549a-gilt-pollock-1722-low-r7-pr63-pcgs-secure/a/1209-3583.s) His motives for revisiting the $50 denomination coin may not have been entirely pure, however. Linderman had something in common with the former Mint superintendent, James Ross Snowden. (He was the uncle of American diplomat Archibald Loudon Snowden.) Both men were notorious for selling unauthorized pieces to dealers, collectors, and members of Congress. They could then pocket the money for themselves. Such mixing of mint operations with private enterprise had been an issue since at least the dismissal of a Chief Coiner, [Franklin Peale](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Peale#Downfall), in 1854. This type of practice was certainly against the law, but the regulations against it weren't strictly enforced until 1887. Chief Engraver Charles Barber (son of his predecessor, William Barber) created the design for the Half Union coin. Barber adopted a very similar motif for Lady Liberty facing left as had been used for the $20 double eagle coin, which was designed by a former chief engraver, the late James Longacre. The reverse featured an heraldic eagle and thirteen stars. Just two pattern coins—trial strikes of proposed new designs—were made of the $50 Half Union. The new $50 coins never went into full production. Like today, most of the public was utterly unaware of its existence. In addition to the fifty-dollar gold piece, the mint also drew up plans for an even more ambitious $100 Union coin. Such a denomination was part of the original 1854 legislation. No patterns were ever struck, and only sketches made by Assistant Engraver George Morgan survived. You will sometimes see replicas based on Morgan's $100 Union design on privately-minted novelties today. About a dozen copper examples of the Half Union were also made in 1877, however. They were distributed ("under the table" of course) among collectors close to Linderman and Snowden. Due to their rarity and oddity, these copper Half Union patterns still sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars to this day. Perhaps half of them are gilt, i.e. gilded in a thin layer of gold. These were among many U.S. pattern coins catalogued by numismatist J. Hewitt Judd. The copper Half Union varieties are classified by the abbreviation Judd-1549, or J-1549. ##The Legacy of the $50 Half Union##Summary: The $50 Half Union gold coin idea never made it past the proposal stage, but it is still admired today.
The only two extant patterns of the Half Union made of 90% gold currently reside at the Smithsonian Institution in the museum's National Numismatic Collection. They are the property of the government and not legal to own. (More on that below.) Modern replicas of the coin called half union tribute proofs have been made, but they don't quite capture the artistic skill and beauty of the original 19th-century design. If you could own one, the Half Union would have ridiculous collectible value due to the rarity of just two patterns existing. The path these coins took to becoming illegal for private ownership was an interesting precursor to the saga with the [1933 Saint-Gaudens double eagle](/podcast/most-controversial-gold-coin). In the early 1900s, the Half Union patterns were not in the custody of the U.S. Mint. They were in the possession of a high-end collector, William Woodin. Woodin would later become Treasury Secretary in 1933. His connections to the Treasury Department no doubt aided in his acquisition of the coins. Eventually, the mint [strongly advised Woodin to return the patterns](https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1877-50-j-1546/61890#sectionNarrative); he did so, but only in exchange for several other rare coins from the Mint Cabinet!1877 $50 Half Union pattern (reverse)
The Type 1 design of the 1 oz American Gold Eagle.
Everett Millman
Everett has been the head content writer and market analyst at Gainesville Coins since 2013. He has a background in History and is deeply interested in how gold and silver have historically fit into the financial system.
In addition to blogging, Everett's work has been featured in Reuters, CNN Business, Bloomberg Radio, TD Ameritrade Network, CoinWeek, and has been referenced by the Washington Post.